Abstract
Background: Family planning is an effort to reduce population explosion, such as the use of post-placental IUD contraception. The effectiveness and safety of these contraceptives have been proven, in addition to preventing unwanted pregnancies, reducing unmet needs, and preventing missed opportunities. This study aimed to identify attitudes towards post-placental IUDs and the relationship between attitudes towards respondents' experiences, and sociodemographic characteristics, evaluating the reliability of various sources of information and respondents' trust in the use of post-natal contraception and other social institutions.
Subjects and Method: A survey was conducted in Malang, East Java. A total of 200 women were selected for this study. The dependent variable was attitudes. The independent variables were reliability, information, knowledge, and satisfaction. The data were collected using questionnaire and analyzed by logistic regression.
Results: Unreliable health workers (OR= 1.64 95% CI= 1.24 to 2.16; p< 0.001), lack of information (OR= 1.79; 95% CI= 1.31 to 2.43; p< 0.001), lack of knowledge of health workers (OR= 2.32; 95% CI= 1.75; p<0.001), and patient dissatisfaction (OR= 3.32; 95% CI= 2.11 to 5.24; p<0.001) increased negative attitudes towards receiving a post-placental IUD.
Conclusion: Unreliable health workers, lack of information, poor knowledge of health workers, and patient dissatisfaction increases negative attitudes towards receiving a post-placental IUD.
Keywords: attitudes, post-placental IUD, survey, Malang
Correspondence: Henri Sulistiyanto. Doctoral Program in Development Counselling/ Community Empowerment Graduate School, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: henrisulistiyanto2@gmail.com. Mobile: +6281330432474.
Article Data
References
Abdiana, A. (2019). Kualitas Hidup Penderita Penyakit Hipertensi Peserta Prolanis Di Puskesmas Kecamatan Padang Utara Kota Padang’, J. Sehat Mandiri, 14(2).
Anderson N, Steinauer J, Valente T, Koblentz J, Dehlendorf C (2014). Women’s social communication about IUDs: a qualitative analysis. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 46:141–8. Doi: 10.1363/46e1814
Arede M, Bravo-Araya M, Bouchard É, Singh Gill G, Plajer V, Shehraj A, et al. (2019). Combating vaccine hesitancy: teaching the next generation to navigate through the post truth era. Front Public Health. 6:381. Doi: 10.3389/- fpubh.2018.00381
Aristide C, Mwakisole A, Mwakisole N, Emmanuel M, Laizer E, Kihun rwa A, Downs D, et al. (2020). Design and pilot testing of a church-based intervention to address interpersonal and intra-personal barriers to uptake of family planning in rural Tanzania: a qualitative implementation study. BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 46(3), 226–233. Doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200505.
Armstrong K, Putt M, Halbert CH, Grande D, Schwartz JS, Liao K, Marcus N, et al. (2013). Prior experiences of racial discrimination and racial differences in health care system distrust. Med Care. 51(2), 144–150. Doi: 10.- 1097/MLR.0b013e31827310a1
Asker C, Stokes-Lampard H, Beavan J, Wilson S (2006). What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women nonusers: a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 32:89–94. Doi: 10.1783/147118906776276170
Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional, 2018. a. Lestari Kam- pung KB https://kampungkb.- bkkbn.go.id/kampung/16524/le stari [Diakses 15 Agustus 2023].
Briga SK, Mustafa AM (2015). Awareness about postpartum insertion of intrauterine device among antenatal cases. Medical journal, Armed Forces India., 71(3), pp. 221-224.
Daniele MA, Cleland J, Benova L, Ali M (2017). Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review. Reprod Health. 14:1–11. Doi: 10.1186/- s12978-017-0380-8
Freed GL, Clark SJ, Butchart AT, Singer DC, Davis MM (2010). Parental vaccine safety concerns in 2009. Pediatrics. 125:654–9. Doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1962 46.
Maria W, Lena G (2022). Attitude Toward the Copper IUD in Sweden: A Survey Studi. Frontiers in Global Women Health. 08 Juli 2022 Doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022. 920298
Shui IM, Weintraub ES, Gust DA (2006). Parents concerned about vaccine safety: Differences in race/ethnicity and attitudes. Am J Prevent Med. 31:244– 51. Doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.006
Foran T (2019). Contraception and the media: lessons past, present and future. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 24:80–2. Doi: 10.- 1080/13625187.2018.1563067
Grandahl M, Oscarsson M, Stenham-mar C, Nevéus T, Westerling R, Tydén T (2014). Not the right time: why parents refuse to let their daughters have the human papillomavirus vaccination. Acta Paediatr. 103:436– 41. Doi: 10.1111/apa.12545 44.
Holt K, Zavala I, Quintero X, Mendoza D, McCormick MC, Dehlendorf C, et al. (2018). Women’s preferences for contraceptive counseling in Mexico: results from a focus group study. Reprod Health. 15:1–11. doi: 10.1186/- s12978-018-0569-5
Hoggart L, Newton VL (2013). Young women’s experiences of side- effects from contraceptive implants: a challenge to bodily control. Reprod Health Matters. 21:196–204. Doi: 10.1016/S09 68-8080(13)41688-9.
Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Eckersberger E, Smith DM, Paterson P (2014). Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature. Vaccine. 32:2150–9. Doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.08139
Pangestika WW, Ayun SA, Winarni I S (2018). Pemanfaatan Pelayanan Kb-Mkjp Oleh Pasangan Usia Subur Kelompok Masyarakat Miskin Di Kecamatan Tembalang Kota Semarang. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 6(5), pp. 189-201.
Wardani NEK, Irawati D, Wayanti S. (2019). Pengaruh Konseling Terhadap Pengetahuan dan Sikap Calon Akseptor KB dalam Pemilihan AKDR Post Plasenta. Jurnal Pamator. Volume 12 No. 1, April 2019 Hlm. 1 – 4.
Wang Y, McKee M, Torbica A, Stuckler D (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Soc Sci Med. 240:112552. Doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.- 112552.
